全球视线开云体育(中国)官方网站

每周从全球各大与公益慈善或社会立异畛域相干的媒体或专科网站，去浏览发现当下正在发生的案例和正在念念考的不雅点，然后翻译整理成篇，传达第一手的崭新资讯。栏目但愿不错通过著作的视角或者表述，为会员伙伴们提供启发、通达视线。

问&答：小镇慈功德业濒临的挑战和契机是什么？

明尼苏达州北部的一个慈善组织，但愿匡助农村社区毫无挂牵田主张并诈欺他们领有的端庄天然和社会资源，以创造更好意思好的畴前。

起原：

张开剩余97%

The Daily Yonder/逐日远处

作家：

Adam B. Giorgi

著作《Q&A: What Are the Challenges and Opportunities of Small-Town Philanthropy?/问&答：小镇慈义举止濒临的挑战和契机是什么？》发布在The Daily Yonder/逐日远处上，这是一家提供估量好意思国农村地区的新闻、辩驳和分析的媒体。这是一篇问答式的报说念，采访了布兰丁基金会的高等农村宣传司理珍妮弗·贝维斯。著作先容了布兰丁基金会在补助乡村社区方面的责任，尽头是该基金会如何通过资助明尼苏达州的微型乡村社区，匡助责罚场所问题，以达成振兴与发展。他们专注于资源有限的小镇，简化苦求历程并提供资金补助，使这些社区能够自主责罚问题，同期鞭策社会效益和历久影响。

The small town of Grand Rapids, Minnesota has found itself in the headlines over the years due to its connection to Judy Garland and a certain pair of stolen ruby slippers. That’s the kind of tale that big-city journalists, true-crime podcasters, and Hollywood screenwriters just can’t help themselves over, but, to no surprise of our readers, there’s way more to say and appreciate about Grand Rapids. Among these is that it is home to one of the only rural-based and rural-focused foundations in the whole U.S. This is an area of particular interest to us, as captured in some of our prior interviews. I’m additionally excited to tell you about it because the Blandin Foundation is less than an hour away from my hometown and the communities where I grew up.

明尼苏达州的小镇大洪水城因其与朱迪·嘉兰及一对被盗的红坚持鞋的估量，多年来多次登上新闻头条。这么的故事总会眩惑到大城市的记者、竟然犯法题材播客主捏东说念主和好莱坞编剧的关注。但毫无疑问，咱们的读者一定知说念，大洪水城的魔力远不啻于此。其中一个值得关注的亮点是，它是全好意思少数几家专注于农村地区、并由农村社区主导的基金会所在地。这话题一直是咱们的尽头关注点，正如咱们之前的一些采访所展现的。此外，我尤其期待向大众先容布兰丁基金会，因为这家基金会距离我的家乡和我成长的社区不到一小时车程。

Jennifer Bevis is the Senior Rural Advocacy Manager at Blandin, and her experiences and perspectives concerning rural Minnesota were quite familiar and rang true to me. There may not be as much drama as a Hollywood caper, but her work brings with it some great stories too.

珍妮弗·贝维斯是布兰丁基金会的高等农村宣传司理，她对明尼苏达州农村的劝诫和想法让我倍感老到，也深有共识。天然这其中能够莫得好莱坞式的戏剧脾节气，但她的责任相似生长着好多精彩的故事。

Enjoy our conversation about the charms of living in rural Minnesota, some of the unique challenges and opportunities of small-town philanthropy, and a big picture view on how we might reach a more prosperous future for rural people and places.

请观赏咱们对于明尼苏达州农村生存魔力的对话，探讨小城镇慈功德业所濒临的私有挑战与机遇，并从宏不雅角度瞻望如何为农村社区和住户创造愈加繁茂的畴前

珍妮弗·贝维斯是布兰丁基金会的高等农村倡导司理。该基金会是全好意思为数未几的驻足于农村、专注于农村发展的基金会之一。

图片起原：珍妮弗·贝维斯

亚当·乔尔吉，《逐日远处/The Daily Yonder》（以下简称《逐日远处》）

For those who are unfamiliar, tell us a little bit about the Blandin Foundation, its home territory, and the history there.

对于不太了解的东说念主，您能否简短先容一下布兰丁基金会、它所行状的地区以及基金会的发展历程？

珍妮弗·贝维斯

We’re one of the few rural-based, rural-serving private foundations in the country, and we’ve been supporting rural communities for over 80 years.

咱们是全好意思为数未几的驻足农村、行状农村的私东说念主基金会之一，80多年来一直致力于于补助农村社区的发展。

Our story goes back to Charles K. Blandin, who owned the paper mill in Grand Rapids, Minnesota, and founded the foundation in 1941. His vision was to create a foundation that could adapt over time to meet changing needs, and that’s something we take seriously to this day.

咱们的故事不错考究到查尔斯·K·布兰丁，他曾是明尼苏达州大洪水城一家造纸厂的通盘者，并在1941年创立了布兰丁基金会。他的愿景是设置一个能够跟着时辰推移而支持，以知足连接变化的需求的基金会，这亦然咱们于今仍在认真对待的事情。

Right now, we’re focused on building community wealth, rural placemaking, and strengthening the capacity of people and organizations in communities under 5,000 people. We also look at big challenges like rural inequities tied to place, race, and class.

目前，咱们的要点是建造社区资产、鞭策农村场所营造，以及增强东说念主口不到5000的社区当中的个东说念主与组织的智商。同期，咱们也关注一些首要挑战，比如与地域、种族和阶层相干的农村不对等问题。

Most of our work centers around Grand Rapids and Itasca County, where 60% of our funding stays, but we also support rural Minnesota communities statewide. At nearly 3,000 square miles, Itasca County is roughly the size of Yellowstone National Park, so it’s no small task. It’s all about listening, learning, and responding to what rural people say they need—and helping bring those ideas to life.

咱们的大部单干作齐围绕大洪水城和伊塔斯卡县张开，咱们60%的资金齐用于这两个场所，但咱们也为明尼苏达州全州的农村社区提供补助。伊塔斯卡县的面积接近3000平方英里，差未几是黄石国度公园的大小，因此这不是一项小任务。咱们要作念的即是倾听、学习和回应农村住户的需求，并匡助他们将这些想法变为履行。

《逐日远处》

How did you come to your work in rural philanthropy and what’s your personal connection to the areas the foundation serves?

您是如何运行从事农村慈善责任的？您个东说念主与基金会行状的地区有什么估量？

珍妮弗·贝维斯

I grew up as a “country kid,” surrounded by the joys of rural life. My mom, raised on a farm, wanted her family to experience the same, so my parents bought an old farmstead. While my dad, a plant pathologist, worked with crops and farmers in western Minnesota’s Red River Valley, my mom gardened, and my sisters and I cared for animals. I especially loved my chickens, the flaming prairie sunsets, and the retired farm couples who became like adopted grandparents—dropping by for coffee, asking about my track meets, and attending my band concerts.

我是一个典型的“乡村孩子”，从小被乡村生存的乐趣所包围。我姆妈在农场长大，她但愿她的家东说念主也能体验相似的生存，是以我父母买了一个老农场。我的父亲是又名植物病理学家，在明尼苏达州西部的红河谷从事农作物和农民责任，我的母亲则负责园艺责任，我和姐姐们则护理动物。我尽头心爱我的小鸡、火红的草原日落，还有那些退休的农场配偶，他们就像我的养祖父母一样，每每还喝咖啡，讨论我田径比赛的情况，还干涉我的乐队音乐会。

Instead of heading to the city for college, I stayed rooted in rural Minnesota, attending a campus overlooking the Minnesota River Valley. Small-town life in St. Peter balanced perfectly with the broader perspectives I gained in class.

我并莫得采纳去大城市读大学，而是扎根于明尼苏达州的乡村，在一所不错俯视明尼苏达河谷的校园里学习。圣彼得的小镇生存与我在课堂上得到的更广袤视线，变成了完好的均衡。

I took my first job in a new rural place – the deep woods and rugged rocks of northern Minnesota’s Iron Range. I loved telling the stories of people building businesses, schools, and towns. Their grit, ingenuity, and passion — whether running a café or conducting particle physics research in the Northwoods—showed me I’d made the right choice in embracing rural life.

我的第一份责任是在一个新的农村地区，位于明尼苏达州北部铁矿区的深山老林和落魄岩石中。我心爱阐发东说念主们建造企业、学校和城镇的故事。他们的勇气、贤人和眷注，无论是筹画咖啡馆如故在北林区进行粒子物理学研究，齐向我评释注解，我采纳拥抱农村生存是正确的决定。

Now, my family and I live in the Grand Rapids area along the Mississippi River, another rural community that’s welcomed me with open arms. Each of these communities has gifted me with special people and places. Like many who choose rural living, I’m drawn to the closeness to nature, the space for independence, and the deep sense of belonging that comes from being part of a close-knit community.

当今，我和家东说念主住在密西西比河边的大洪水城地区，这是另一个眷注接待我的农村社区。每一个社区齐赋予了我特殊的东说念主和事。和好多采纳乡村生存的东说念主一样，我也被这里亲近天然的环境、自强门庭的空间，以及当作一个精致合营的社区一员所带来的深深包摄感所眩惑。

《逐日远处》

As you noted, Blandin’s roots are in north central Minnesota, serving a collection of small towns not far from the Mississippi headwaters, but its programs and strategies also extend to rural Minnesota at large. Why is looking at rural Minnesota in this broader way important? And what’s the landscape look like in terms of philanthropic attention across rural Minnesota? I noticed in one of your recent grant announcements that rural areas in Minnesota receive less than 8% of philanthropic funding, a good deal smaller than their nearly 23% share of the state’s population.

正如您所指出的，布兰丁基金会的根基在明尼苏达州中北部，行状的是围聚密西西比河起源的一些小镇，但基金司帐划和策略也膨大蔓延到了通盘这个词明尼苏达州的农村地区。为什么以这种更广袤的视角来看待明尼苏达州的农村地区很紧迫？而在农村慈功德业的关注度方面，通盘这个词明尼苏达州的情况又是怎样的？我看重到，在你们最近发布的一项资助公告中，明尼苏达州农村地区得到的慈善资助不到8%，而这些地区的住户约占全州东说念主口的23%，这个比例彰着偏低。

珍妮弗·贝维斯

I’m stating the obvious here, but under-resourced rural communities are present all across America – not just in rural Minnesota. Food, transportation, medical and news deserts in rural America are the hallmarks of decades of outdated fiscal policies.

我在这里说的可能是不言而喻的，但资源不及的农村社区遍布全好意思，而不单是只是明尼苏达州的农村。好意思国农村的食物、交通、医疗和新闻沙漠是几十年来过期财政政策的显赫特征。

Broadening our view beyond our local giving area makes these impacts crystal clear, from northern Minnesota’s mining and forestlands to the farming, wind energy and manufacturing areas in the central and south of the state. Rural is NOT a monolith. Each community has its own unique identity and DNA. Yet we see and hear from rural people seeking to spark change and rebuild resilience that navigating most sources of support is complicated and time-consuming. Most funders assume applicants regularly work with grantwriters, and that communities can seek or raise significant matching funds. These types of parameters do not play to rural’s strengths of strong, trusted social connections, can-do attitude, and crafting community-specific solutions on a shoestring.

将咱们的视线扩大到当地捐赠区域除外，这些影响就一目了然了，从明尼苏达州北部的矿区和林地，到州中部和南部的农业、风能和制造业地区。农村地区绝非一个斡旋的全体。每个社区齐有其私有的身份和特征。可是，咱们从寻求变革并重建报恩力的农村住户那里听到的信息是，大部分获取补助的门道齐异常复杂和费时。大多数资助者齐默许苦求东说念主每每会与资助苦求撰写东说念主合作，何况社区能够寻求或筹集到可不雅的配套资金。这些要求条款无法阐发农村的上风，即刚劲、值得相信的社会关系、积极跳跃的作风以及在有限资金下制定妥当社区需求的责罚决议。

Yet we also know that rural places have significant philanthropic power. The University of Minnesota conducted an important study earlier this year chronicling what will be the largest generational transfer of wealth in the history of the country. Since rural communities skew older than urban areas, the transition is happening faster in rural places.

可是，咱们也知说念，农村地区领有宽绰的慈善力量。本年早些时候，明尼苏达大学进行了一项紧迫研究，研究纪录了将成为好意思国历史上最大一笔代际资产滚动的过程。由于农村社区的东说念主口老龄化进度高于城市地区，农村地区的资产滚动速率更快。

The study estimates that $61 billion in wealth will change hands in the next 10 years alone. If rural communities capture even a tiny portion of that – say 1-5% – for rural grantmaking and endowments – and apply these funds to local nonprofit and philanthropic use, we could significantly benefit local arts, recreation, crisis centers and other critical community needs.

该研究计算，仅在畴前10年内，就将有610亿好意思元的资产发生滚动。要是农村社区能从中得到一小部分（比如1-5%）用于农村资助和捐赠基金，并将这些资金用于当地的非渔利组织和慈功德业，咱们就能极大地惠及当地的艺术、文娱、危急中心和其他的紧迫社区需求。

If invested in new endowments over two decades, the captured pool could support grantmaking in the hundreds of millions of dollars. Nonprofits and their communities could leverage those dollars to support new workforce housing construction, develop major nonprofit capital projects and help lower-income residents launch new businesses.

要是这些资金在二十年内被投资到新的捐赠基金中，所积蓄的资金池不错补助数亿好意思元的资助。非渔利组织偏激社区不错诈欺这些资金补助新建的劳能源住房、开发首要非渔利成本名目，并匡助低收入住户启动新的企业。

尽管明尼苏达州的农村地区领有近23%的东说念主口，但得到的慈善资金却不到该州的8%。

图片起原：布兰丁基金会

《逐日远处》

What are some of the unique challenges – and opportunities – for foundations serving rural communities? And what might they teach us about trying to build more momentum for rural philanthropy?

对于行状于农村社区的基金会来说，有哪些私有的挑战和机遇？它们可能会给咱们带来什么启示，匡助咱们为农村慈功德业积蓄更多的能源？

珍妮弗·贝维斯

One of the biggest challenges is the continual flow of requests for support that exceeds our available resources, money and time. We know we never have everything we would need to fulfill every ask.

最大的挑战之一是连接涌来的补助请求，这些请求远远超出了咱们现存的资源、资金和时辰。咱们知说念，咱们永远无法知足每一个需求。

Challenges we see in rural people and places hit even harder. We know from local studies that demand for rural leadership is three times higher in the nonprofit sector and 25 times higher in government than in urban areas. The “role fatigue” of people stretched thin in leadership can dent our spirits and make us wary of volunteering. But with just a little help, the per capita impact of change in a small community can be greatly amplified. Yet those multilayered responsibilities also spur rural people to take on new roles, because they realize that they ARE “the someone” who gets things done for their community.

咱们在农村社区和住户中看到的挑战愈加严峻。咱们从当地的研究中了解到：在非渔利畛域，农村地区对率领力的需求是城市地区的三倍，而在政府部门，这一需求则是城市的25倍。由于率领力的衣衫破烂，导致好多东说念主堕入了“脚色疲惫”，这不仅会拖沓咱们的斗志，还会让咱们对志愿行状产生抵御情谊。但是，惟有有一丝点的匡助，一个小社区里的每个东说念主的更正，就能产生宽绰的影响。可是，这些多重拖累也激发着农村东说念主去承担新的脚色，因为他们意志到他们即是阿谁为社区作念事的“东说念主”。

Around the office, we call it “for us, by us” philanthropy. It’s community-informed. Community-centered. Community-specific. We’re continually amazed by the practical, workable, effective solutions shared with us. They come from a place of wisdom about the family contexts, economic realities and closely-held dreams people have to make their community a place where people can live with dignity and feel welcome – no matter how small your community. The power and poignancy of seeing that work happen every day, right where you live and work, gives rural philanthropy an immediacy, relevance – momentum –that’s hard to top.

在咱们的办公室里，咱们称之为“为咱们，由咱们”的慈功德业。它是由社区提供信息、以社区为中心，何况针对具体社区的。咱们连接被那些共享给咱们的、切实可行的且行之灵验的责罚决议所惊艳。这些决议源于东说念主们对家庭布景、经济履行和深藏心中的想象的瞻念察与贤人积蓄，其打算是让社区成为一个充满尊容和包摄感的家园，无论其范畴大小。每天在我方生存和责任所在的场所，亲眼见证这些更正的发生，其力量和感染力赋予了农村慈功德业一种无可比较的径直性、履行意旨和推能源。

《逐日远处》

Blandin recently rolled out a round of grants helping Minnesota’s smallest communities — with populations under 5,000 people — address a wide variety of local needs. What was the inspiration behind that program and what are some of the community projects it has supported? The announcement noted that something as simple as installing a door for a municipal office could make a big difference in these places.

布兰丁基金会最近推出了一轮资助打算，来匡助明尼苏达州东说念主口不及5000东说念主的微型社区责罚各样当地需求。该打算背后的灵感是什么？它补助了哪些社区名目？公告中提到，即使是为市政办公室装配一扇门这么简短的举措，也可能在这些社区带来宽绰变化。

珍妮弗·贝维斯

During the pandemic, we were overwhelmed with responses to grants targeted to communities with populations under 3,000. We expected up to 100 requests totaling $1 million. We fielded 324 requests for $24 million.

在疫情手艺，咱们收到了多数针对3000东说念主以下社区的资助苦求。咱们原来预计最多会收到100份苦求，总金额约为100万好意思元。遵循实质收到了324份苦求，苦求总金额达2400万好意思元。

It was good insight into the incredible need in our small communities and also their dreams and innovation.

这让咱们深入体会到微型社区的宽绰需求，同期也看到了他们的想象与立异精神。

Informed by that overwhelming response and new data that showed a profound disparity in rural philanthropy, our leadership and trustees have staked out new priorities for the Blandin Foundation in the areas of Small Communities and Rural Placemaking. Small communities often do not have the resources or staff to search for and apply for grants, so we made the system as simple as possible.

鉴于这一激烈的反响和新数据表露农村慈功德业存在宽绰各异，咱们的率领层和董事会为布兰丁基金会栽培了新的优先标的，聚焦于微型社区和乡村的场所营造。微型社区泛泛莫得资源或东说念主员来寻找和苦求资助，因此咱们尽可能简化了系统。

The grant application we received from Richville – population 78 – was just like small towns are: plain spoken and conveyed with a can-do attitude. Leslie Lee, Richville’s city clerk, wrote this in her grant application.

咱们收到了来自里奇维尔（东说念主口78）的资助苦求，正如小镇的特色一样：直肠直肚，充满了乐不雅跳跃的作风。里奇维尔的布告官莱斯莉·李在她的资助苦求中这么写说念：

“Our goal is very simple. We wish to build a wall with a door. The goal of this project is to give the city an office space. This will make us more available to the community and enable us to safeguard the city’s business in a designated place.”

“咱们的打算很简短。咱们但愿建一面墙，并装一扇门。这个名宗旨宗旨是为城市提供一个办公室空间。这将使咱们更容易为社区行状，也能为市政治务提供一个挑升的场所，以便妥善管束。

This is not a request for hundreds of thousands of dollars. It did not take a team of people or consultants to submit it. But this small and seemingly simple request – for a door and some basic office equipment – gives the city of Richville something that pound for pound is just as important as some of our biggest grants: it gives them the power to design their own future.

这不是一笔数十万好意思元的资助苦求，也不需要一支团队或参谋人来提交。但这个看似简短的小请求：一扇门和一些基本的办公开拓，却为里奇维尔提供了与咱们最大资助名目相似紧迫的东西：它赋予了他们设计我方畴前的职权。

We have learned that with a modest amount of money and a little support, towns like Richville can do incredible things. The key is respecting their own unique identity. It means meeting communities where they are at, rather than imposing someone else’s ideas and structure on them.

咱们了解到，凭借极少资金和一些补助，像里奇维尔这么的城镇也能作念出令东说念主咋舌的变化。重要在于尊重他们我方的私有身份。这意味着要把柄社区的实质情况提供匡助，而不是把别东说念主的想法和结构强加给他们。

It also helps fight the narrative of “rural decline” and brings visible change and enhances community engagement.

这也有助于对抗“农村败落”的说法，带来可见的变化，并增强社区参与感。

As a staff, we can’t talk about Richville and the 71 other communities awarded grants through the Small Communities and Rural Placemaking program without breaking into grins, and tears. It’s the type of community-based philanthropy we’re convinced works. We’re also excited that since 2022 our grant funds have reached more than 100 new communities. Their requests provide insight into the needs and dreams of small-town Minnesota, like a digital literacy hub, new grandstands and speakers at pow-wow grounds, and updating a community center’s stove, tables and chairs and adding space for a food pantry. Having a functioning stove might seem insignificant from a conventional philanthropic perspective. But that equipment allows a community center—likely one of the town’s few civic institutions—to host the functions and events that bring community members together to address the challenges they face. Our grants staff considers these types of multiplier factors in their grant review, and program evaluation. We need to measure not just what gets completed but also the things that the community then uses that project to do in the future.

谈起里奇维尔和其他71个通过“微型社区和农村场所营造打算”得到资助的社区，咱们的责任主说念主员齐会忍不住笑出声来，致使流下眼泪。这恰是咱们敬佩灵验的、以社区基础的慈善形势。相似令咱们感到直爽的是，自2022年以来，咱们的资助资金已惠及了100多个新社区。这些社区的请求为咱们提供了对于明尼苏达州小镇需乞降想象的端庄瞻念察，比如数字扫盲中心、约会场面的新看台和扬声器，以及更新社区中心的炉子、桌椅，增多食物银行的空间。从传统慈善角度来看，领有一台广泛运转的炉子似乎微不及说念。但有了这些开拓，社区中心（可能是该镇为数未几的全球机构之一），就不错阐发功能、举办各式举止，将社区成员汇聚在沿途，共同应酬他们所濒临的挑战。咱们的资助责任主说念主员在审查资助和评估名目时，还会计划这些类型的倍增效应。咱们需要权衡的不单是是已完成的名目，还要评估社区如何诈欺这些名目作念更多的事情。

《逐日远处》

Your title is Senior Rural Advocacy Manager, so I want to give you a chance to do some advocating, to give voice to your rural people. With the soapbox and the megaphone at hand, what are your hopes for rural places in 2025 and beyond? Taking the big picture view, what will it take to get to the vibrant, sustainable, equitable rural futures envisioned by Blandin and other advocates?

你的头衔是高等农村宣传司理，是以我想给你一个契机，让你作念一些宣传，为你的农村东说念主民发声。有了演讲台和扩音器，您对2025年及以后的农村地区有什么盼愿？从大局动身，如何材干达成布兰丁基金会和其他倡导者所遐想的充满活力、可捏续、平允的农村畴前？

珍妮弗·贝维斯

I want rural places to be confident in what and who they are. Clear-eyed and honest about the challenges right under our noses. To unapologetically claim the valuable natural and social resources we have, and put them to work to our advantage. To resist the momentum of the many stereotypes that aim to box us into spaces that don’t fit, and hinder our ability to see ourselves accurately and act in our best interests. To have courage through change, and the seeds of hope for the future.

我但愿农村地区对我方的定位和身份充满信心。线路而真诚大地对目下的挑战。毫无挂牵田主张咱们领有的端庄天然和社会资源，并让它们为咱们所用。箝制各式刻板印象的势头，这些刻板印象会将咱们松手在不允洽的空间中，辞谢咱们准确清爽我方并摄取妥当本身利益的步履。敢于更正，播下对畴前的但愿种子。

Reaching toward the future we envision will take mutual respect, at all levels. Among people in each community, so we’re clear on where we’re headed and why, who’s good at what, and how together we move forward. Between communities, so we see the patterns that link us, share a view of a collective future and build a strong sense of regionalism to guide our future decisions. And across the alleged rural/urban divide, so the regions of our state contribute their all, in service to a Minnesota that is more than the sum of its parts.

要达成咱们遐想的畴前，需要各个层面的相互尊重。在每个社区的东说念主们之间，咱们要明确我方将要走向那处，为什么走那条路，谁擅长什么，以及如何联袂共进。在社区之间，咱们要看到将咱们估量在沿途的景观，共享对集体畴前的看法，并设置强烈的地区意志，以率领咱们畴前的决策。跨越所谓的城乡差距，咱们州的各个地区齐孝顺出我方的一切，为明尼苏达州行状，让明尼苏达州突出其各个部分的总数。

As one of the guardians of Blandin Foundation’s voice, I love that I get to recognize and surface the mosaic of rural life, to bridge gaps and shed light on issues that often go unnoticed – particularly at the intersection of race, place and class. If I’ve helped make something invisible visible, and shared stories that aren’t just heard, but understood and acted on – it’s been a good week.

当作布兰丁基金会声息的督察者之一，我很欢乐能够清爽和揭示农村生存的方方面面，弥合差距，揭示每每被刻毒的问题，尤其是在种族、地域和阶层的交织处。要是我匡助东说念主们看到了一些看不见的东西，共享的故事不单是是被东说念主们听到，而且是被东说念主们阐述并付诸步履，那么这即是好意思好的一周。

重要句翻译

场所营造是一种算计、设计和管束全球空间的多方面次第。场所营造诈欺当地社区的资产、灵感和后劲，旨在创造能够改善城市活力和促进东说念主们健康、幸福和福祉的全球空间。那么场所营造的英文是什么？

Placemaking

place n. 场所；场所

翻译、撰稿：丁适于（杭州市基金会发展促进会）

发布于：浙江省